Answer
Last year (2025-2026) had no rating words. The seven dimensions were scored
1–5 as bare numbers — there was no “1 = …, 5 = …” legend anywhere on the form, and none in
the system’s source. The wording “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional” is new this season.
Last year — the 2025-2026 form, running right now
Screenshot taken directly from the old review system on the server (reviewer queue → first file). Nothing on it is a mock-up.
Full form. Seven dimensions, each with 1–5 buttons and no wording; then “Reviewer Notes”; then “Interview Recommendation” (Definitely / Maybe / Do Not Interview). Click to open full size.
This year — the same seven dimensions, now with a legend
Screenshot from the live reviewer reading room.
This season’s mark sheet. The dimensions match last year exactly; the added line is the legend “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional”.
Side by side
| Last year (2025-2026) | This season | |
|---|---|---|
| Seven dimensions | Preference for Program · Ability to Handle Pressure · Commitment to Underserved · Leadership · Academic Performance · Research · Personal Attributes/Grit | Identical — same seven names |
| Scale | 1 2 3 4 5 — bare, no words | 1–5 + “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional” |
| Total | out of 35 | out of 35 |
| Recommendation | Definitely / Maybe / Do Not Interview | Definitely / Maybe / Do Not Evaluate |
How I checked it (so you can re-run it)
- The running old system is still up on the server. Its form text was read live: it contains the dimension names and “Interview Recommendation”, and contains zero occurrences of any rating word.
- The old system’s source renders the buttons as bare numbers — no label element exists:
{[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map((score) => ( <button key={score} onClick={...}> {score} </button> ))}Grepping that whole codebase for “exceptional”, “concern”, “Poor”, “Excellent” or “Average” returns no rating wording at all. - The database agrees. Last year’s reviews live in
urology_reviews, where the seven dimensions are stored as plain integers (preference,pressure,underserved,leadership,academic,research,personal, each constrained 1–5). There is no column anywhere that has ever held rating words. - The dates line up. All 147 reviews for that cycle were entered 2–15 October 2025 — about a year before this portal existed — so they were scored on the form shown above.
