Evaluation rating scale — last year vs this year

Captured live on 2026-09-27 from the systems themselves, so the claim can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Answer
Last year (2025-2026) had no rating words. The seven dimensions were scored 1–5 as bare numbers — there was no “1 = …, 5 = …” legend anywhere on the form, and none in the system’s source. The wording “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional” is new this season.

Last year — the 2025-2026 form, running right now

Screenshot taken directly from the old review system on the server (reviewer queue → first file). Nothing on it is a mock-up.

Last year's review form, full page
Full form. Seven dimensions, each with 1–5 buttons and no wording; then “Reviewer Notes”; then “Interview Recommendation” (Definitely / Maybe / Do Not Interview). Click to open full size.
The scoring area of last year's form
The scoring area up close — the 1–5 buttons carry no labels at all.

This year — the same seven dimensions, now with a legend

Screenshot from the live reviewer reading room.

This year's mark sheet
This season’s mark sheet. The dimensions match last year exactly; the added line is the legend “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional”.

Side by side

Last year (2025-2026)This season
Seven dimensionsPreference for Program · Ability to Handle Pressure · Commitment to Underserved · Leadership · Academic Performance · Research · Personal Attributes/GritIdentical — same seven names
Scale1 2 3 4 5 — bare, no words1–5 + “1 = concern, 5 = exceptional”
Totalout of 35out of 35
RecommendationDefinitely / Maybe / Do Not InterviewDefinitely / Maybe / Do Not Evaluate

How I checked it (so you can re-run it)